home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.th-darmstadt.de!news
- From: Enno Sandner <enno@intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: int::~int()
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 09:32:59 +0200
- Organization: Fachbereich Informatik, TH Darmstadt
- Message-ID: <3171FBAB.794BDF32@intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>
- References: <317083F7.116E@public.sta.net.cn> <ltlojzns3u.fsf@kitz.inferenzsysteme.informatik.th-darmstadt.de> <31719B53.402D@public.sta.net.cn>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kitz.intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3 sun4m)
-
- jafd@public.sta.net.cn wrote:
- >
- > Enno Sandner wrote:
- > ...
- > > It's legal C++ (check out DWP 12.4:12) and e.g. g++2.6.3
- > > compiles this code without any problems.
- > > The explicit invocation of the int-dtor has no effect.
- > >
- > > Enno
- >
- > I found that both Borland C++ 4.x and Visual C++ 4.0 can't
- > compile it!
- >
- > but Watcom C++ 10.0 can compile it.
- >
- > it is strange, both BC++4.x and Visual C++4.0 are newer that
- > Watcom C++ 10.0, but why can't they compile it?
- >
-
- Like for all new language features you will have problems with
- older compilers (wasn't BC 5.x already released ?) that do not
- support these features.
-
- Enno
-